Seismic Diffraction – Modeling, Imaging and Applications
|Prof. Evgeny Landa (Tel Aviv University, Israel)
Dr Tijmen Jan Moser (Moser Geophysical Services, Netherlands)
|Geophysics – Surface Imaging|
|10 CPD points|
CARBONATES DIFFRACTION IMAGING INTERPRETATION FOCUSING DISCONTINUITIES UNCONVENTIONAL TIME-LAPSE INJECTITES FLUID-ESCAPE FEATURES FRACTURES
Next available locations:
- Education Days Kuala Lumpur 2019: a 2-day course on 1 and 2 July 2019 - Register now!
- Education Days Beijing 2019: a 2-day course on 27 and 28 June 2019 - Register now!
- Education Days Perth 2019: a 2-day course on 4 and 5 July 2019 - Register now!
Diffraction phenomena have been identified as the key seismic manifestation of fractures and other small-scale reservoir heterogeneities. This two-day course will present the current state-of-the-art of diffraction technology and put this in context by a review of its past developments. The course will cover both forward diffraction modeling and diffraction imaging. Case studies of diffraction imaging will be presented covering applications in seismic exploration and other areas of geoscientific interest.
The course will be clearly structured in topics and subtopics. At the end of each topic, a number of bullet points will summarize the items meant to be memorized and taken home by the learner. Interaction between the teacher and learner will be encouraged. The course material will be enlightened by out-of-the box examples demonstrating diffraction phenomena that support the techniques.
By the end of this course, the learner will:
- Have a detailed and up-to-date understanding of the physics of diffraction, diffraction modeling and imaging;
- Be able to effectively communicate the key aspects of diffraction technology with other professionals;
- Have a good understanding of the added value that seismic diffraction brings to current exploration and production projects.
- Motivation, basic ideas and concepts
- Reflection versus diffraction
- Applications of diffraction analysis and imaging
- Interpretation value
- Discovery and founding years (1650-1820): Grimaldi, Huygens, Newton, Young, Fresnel, Poisson, Arago
- Scalar diffraction: mathematical foundation — 19th century: Green, Helmholtz, Kirchhoff, Sommerfeld
- Towards Geometrical Theory of Diffraction — early 20th century: Maggi, Rubinowicz, Keller
- Towards Modern Theory: Trorey, Klem-Musatov
- Diffraction Modeling
- Motivation, definitions, objectives
- Physical modeling
- Numerical modeling: integral methods, boundary layer methods, surface and caustic diffraction, finite differences, time-lapse, scattering methods
- Case study: Diffraction analysis on Ground Penetrating Radar Data
- Case study: Diffraction Response of Salt Diapirs
- Diffraction Imaging in the Time Domain
- Motivation, definitions, objectives
- Anatomy of diffraction
- Diffraction and standard processing
- Detection of diffracted waves
- Separation of diffracted waves
- Inversion of diffracted waves
- Common Reflection Surface/Multifocusing
- Focusing and velocity estimation
- Fracture detection
- Diffraction Imaging in the Depth Domain
- Velocity model considerations
- Illumination: edge and tip diffraction imaging
- Depth imaging: general principles
- Resolution and super-resolution
- Image processing and diffraction imaging
- Diffraction imaging by specularity suppression
- Applications: sandstone reservoirs, time-lapse, stratigraphic terminations against salt, Carbonate reservoirs, shale resource plays, unconventional reservoirs
- Case studies
The target audience of the course consists in geoscientists from industry and academia with a basic knowledge of seismic processing and an interest in innovative interpretation technologies.
Prerequisites are a basic knowledge of seismic processing and imaging and a very elementary mathematical background.
About the instructors
Evgeny Landa obtained his MSc degree in geophysics at Novosibirsk University (1972) and PhD degree in geophysics at Tel Aviv University (1986). He started his carrier in the former Soviet Union, Novosibirsk as a researcher, and senior geophysicist at the Siberian Geophysical Expedition. After immigrating to Israel, he worked at the Geophysical Institute of Israel as a researcher, Head of the R&D group and Head of the Seismic Department (1981—2002), and Director of OPERA (Applied Geophysical Research Group) in Pau (France) (2002-2014) where he was involved in different aspects of seismic data processing, velocity model building and time and depth imaging. His work on velocity model building by coherency inversion has had a strong impact on today’s seismic depth imaging workflows and forms an important part of the GeoDepth (Paradigm) software package. Recently, his research interest involves using non-reflecting energy for increasing seismic resolution and imaging without precise velocity information. He has published more than 60 papers in international journals and his book ‘Beyond Conventional Seismic Imaging’. He is a member of EAGE and SEG, from which he received the Awards of Best Paper (SEG, Honorary Mentioned, 2005) and the EAGE Eotvos Award (2007 and 2009).
Tijmen Jan Moser has a PhD from Utrecht University and has worked as a geophysical consultant for a number of companies and institutes (Amoco, Institut Français du Pétrole, Karlsruhe University, Bergen University, Statoil/Hydro, Geophysical Institute of Israel, Fugro-Jason, Horizon Energy Partners). For the last few years he has been working independently with associations with ZTerra, SGS-Horizon and others. He is based in The Hague, The Netherlands. His main interests include seismic imaging, asymptotic methods, seismic reservoir characterization, diffraction and geothermal exploration. He has authored many influential papers on ray theory and ray methods, Born inversion and modeling, macro-model independent imaging, and diffraction imaging, several of which have received Best Paper awards (SEG, 2005 Honorary mention, EAGE 2007 and 2009, Eotvos Award). He is Editor-in-Chief of Geophysical Prospecting and is serving on SEG's Publication Committee and EAGE's Oil Gas & Geoscience Division Committee. He is a member of SEG and MAA and honorary member of EAGE.
Explore other courses under this discipline:
Instructor: Prof. Tariq Alkhalifah (KAUST)
The course starts by introducing the fundamentals of full-waveform inversion (FWI) starting from its basic definition. It focuses on the model update issues and provides analysis of its probable success in converging to a plausible model. In the course we will discuss the many challenges we face in applying FWI on seismic data and introduce modern day proposed solutions to these challenges. The focus of the course will be on FWI applied to anisotropic media. As a result, the course will also introduce anisotropy, its optimal parametrization and wavefield simulation in such media. Practical multi-parameter inversion for anisotropic parameters requires an optimal FWI setup. We will discuss such a setup, which includes the proper parametrization of the medium and data access scheme necessary for a potential convergence to a plausible anisotropic model.
Instructor: Dr Gerard Schuster (KAUST)
This one-day course is designed for a broad range of seismic researchers, data processors, and interpreters working in the petroleum industry. The course teaches the principles of seismic interferometry, ambient noise seismology and their applications to surface seismic, VSP, and OBS data. The ultimate objectives are to enable geophysicists to evaluate the potential of seismic interferometry in uniquely solving their problems.
Instructors: Prof. Evgeny Landa (Tel Aviv University) and Dr Tijmen Jan Moser (Moser Geophysical Services)
Diffractions have been identified as the key seismic manifestation of fractures and other small-scale reservoir heterogeneities. This two-day course will present the current state-of-the-art of diffraction technology and put this in context by a review of its past developments. The course will cover both forward diffraction modeling and diffraction imaging. Case studies of diffraction imaging will be presented covering applications in seismic exploration and other areas of geoscientific interest.
Instructor: Prof. Dr Aldo Vesnaver (The Petroleum Institute)
Building a 3D Earth model in depth is needed not only for accurate seismic imaging, but also for linking well data (as logs and cores) and reservoir simulations. Tomography can build a 3D macro-model for P and S velocities that integrates surface and well data, as well as active and passive seismic. This short course will introduce the basic concepts of traveltime inversion keeping all the math at a very basic level.
Instructor: Dr Ruben Martinez (Reservoir Geoscience)
This course has two main segments. In the first segment, the participant will understand the basic concepts behind the tools commonly employed in velocity model building and depth migration.
In the second segment, the participant will learn how to use these tools for building velocity models and generate seismic images in depth using practical work flows for a variety of complex geologic scenarios. At the end of the course, an overview of the emerging depth imaging technologies is presented.
Instructor: Prof. Evgeny Landa (Tel Aviv University)
While depth imaging play an increasing role in seismic exploration, data analysis and imaging in time domain play an important role. Moreover, for complex models that request the use of prestack depth migration, time imaging usually constitutes a key first step. The proposed course discusses: a) data analysis and imaging based on new procedures such as Multifocusing and Common Reflection Surface; b) diffraction Imaging based on diffracted energy targeting to image small scale subsurface objects; c) imaging without precise knowledge of the subsurface velocity model (path summation); d) pitfalls and challenges of seismic inversion.
Instructor: Mr Etienne Robein (ERT)
The course will present in simple terms (cartoons rather than equations!) the principle of different techniques in each class of methods (Kirchhoff, Beam Migrations, WEM, RTM), while pointing out their respective merits and limitations. Similarities and differences between Time- and Depth-Imaging will be briefly reminded. In parallel, special emphasis is put on methods used to build the necessary anisotropic velocity models. Both Ray-based techniques (linear and non-linear tomography) and wavefield extrapolation-based ones, including Full Waveform Inversion, are addressed.
Instructor: Prof. Dr Dries Gisolf (Delft Inversion)
This two-day course will start with an introduction and a short recap on complex integral transforms (Fourier, Laplace, F/K and linear Radon). Followed by topics on: - The acoustic wave equation in inhomogenous media - Integral representations of the acoustic wave equation; Kirchhoff-Rayleigh and the Scattering Integral (Lippmann-Schwinger) - The AVO data model; Zoeppritz reflection coefficients - Linear inversion of AVO data including regularisation; synthetic and real data examples - The non-linear data model for inversion; data equation and object equation; iterative, multiplicatively regularised inversion - Applications based on an elastic full-wavefield non-linear data model; realistic synthetic reservoir study, real data case studies including low-frequency model extraction and seismic-to-well matching. Synthetic time-lapse example.
Instructor: Mr Piet Gerritsma (Gerritsma Geophysical Training and Consultancy)
The process of migration, whereby a proper image in time or depth of the subsurface is obtained, is directly related with the velocity model that both serves as input for the migration process as well as is the result of such a migration. Therefore migration and velocity model building are intimately related processes and often applied in an iterative mode. This course gives an overwiew with theory and implementation of the representative migration algorithms as well as of the multitude of ways to build and update subsurface velocity models.
Instructor: Prof. Dr Dries Gisolf (Delft Inversion)
This course presents a systematic approach to imaging of acoustic reflection data and the extraction of media property information from the image amplitudes, based on wave theory. Although the approach is valid for a wide range of acoustical frequencies and applications, there is a bias towards seismic imaging.